How a partial commutation of a retirement pension affects a member’s minimum pension payment requirements — pre and post 1 July 2017

retirement pension

Updated: July 2026

SMSF trustees and members in pension phase need to be careful when taking larger withdrawals from a pension account, particularly where the withdrawal is intended to be treated as a partial commutation rather than an ordinary pension payment.

The distinction is important because a pension payment and a lump sum commutation can have different consequences for minimum pension compliance, transfer balance account reporting and the fund’s records.

Minimum pension requirements

For an SMSF pension to continue to meet the pension standards, the required minimum annual pension amount must be paid in cash before 30 June each financial year.

The minimum pension amount is generally calculated based on the member’s age and the pension account balance at the start of the financial year, or when the pension commences if it starts during the year.

If the minimum pension requirements are not met, the fund’s entitlement to exempt current pension income may be affected, and the matter may also create audit and compliance issues.

Partial commutations do not count towards the minimum pension

From 1 July 2017, a payment made as a partial commutation of an account-based pension does not count towards the minimum annual pension payment requirement.

This applies whether the commutation is paid in cash or by way of an in-specie asset transfer.

As a result, trustees should not assume that a large lump sum withdrawal, rollback or asset transfer from a pension account will satisfy the member’s minimum pension requirement. The minimum pension amount must still be paid separately in cash.

Example

Ethan is 66 and receives an account-based pension from his SMSF.

His pension account balance at 1 July is $400,000. His minimum annual pension requirement is $20,000.

During the year, Ethan asks the SMSF trustee to transfer $50,000 of listed shares to him as a partial commutation of his pension.

Although the value of the transfer exceeds the minimum pension requirement, the $50,000 in-specie transfer does not count towards Ethan’s minimum annual pension payment.

The SMSF must still pay Ethan the required minimum pension amount in cash before 30 June.

Why correct classification matters

Before a payment is made, trustees should determine and document whether the withdrawal is intended to be treated as an ordinary pension payment or as a lump sum arising from a partial commutation.

This classification should be supported by the fund’s records and trustee documentation.

A partial commutation may also have transfer balance account reporting consequences. Trustees should ensure the transaction is correctly documented and reported where required.

Division 296 and withdrawal considerations

With the introduction of Division 296 from 1 July 2026, some members may consider whether withdrawals from superannuation could form part of their broader planning strategy to manage their total superannuation balance.

Whether this is appropriate will depend on the member’s personal circumstances, tax position, estate planning objectives, liquidity needs and the overall strategy of the SMSF.

Trustees should not treat withdrawals as a default strategy. They should obtain appropriate advice before taking action and ensure that any withdrawal is correctly classified and documented as either a pension payment or a lump sum commutation.

Practical trustee checklist

Before making a large withdrawal, rollback, in-specie transfer or partial commutation from a pension account, trustees should confirm:

  • the minimum annual pension amount has been calculated correctly;
  • the required minimum pension has been paid in cash, or will be paid before 30 June;
  • the withdrawal has been correctly classified as either a pension payment or a lump sum commutation;
  • the fund’s records and trustee minutes support the treatment adopted;
  • any transfer balance account reporting obligations have been considered; and
  • the withdrawal is consistent with the member’s broader circumstances and the SMSF’s investment and retirement strategy.

The rules around pensions, commutations and reporting can be technical. Trustees should seek professional advice before processing larger withdrawals, rollbacks or in-specie transfers from an SMSF pension account.

About the author

Naz Randeria is the Founder and Managing Director of Reliance Auditing Services. With more than 25 years’ experience in audit and accounting, Naz is an ASIC registered SMSF Auditor, SMSF Specialist Auditor, Registered Company Auditor, and Chartered Accountant.

She is actively involved in the SMSF audit sector and is passionate about sharing audit, compliance and SMSF knowledge with clients, professional colleagues and the wider public.

View Naz Randeria’s full profile

RELIANCE AUDITING SERVICES

Reliance Auditing Services is a specialist independent auditing services firm providing quality audits to SMSFs, companies, not-for-profits and AFS licensees all over Australia. Reliance Auditing places a huge emphasis on educating our clients to ensure they fulfil their reporting obligations.

Call: 1300 291 060
or email us at info@relianceauditing.com.au

DISCLAIMER: This information is an interpretation of rules, regulations and standards. It should not be considered as general or specific advice and neither purports, nor is intended to be advice on any particular matter. No responsibility can be accepted for those who act on the contents of this publication without first obtaining specific advice. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.