Can an AFS Licensee act as an authorised representative of another AFS Licensee?

Financial Services

During 2005, the Financial Services Reform Act 2001 (“Reform Act”) was withdrawn and the entire content of this Reform Act was incorporated into the Corporations Act 2001 (“the Act”). The Reform Act introduced with new disclosure provisions, designed to provide prospective investors sufficient financial information to decide whether they want to invest in certain products. The Reform Act place extensive obligations on providers of retail financial products to make product disclosure statements for these retail financial products. These disclosure provisions now form part of Chapter 7 of the Act.

It is not unusual for financial services practitioners who have operated their business entities as corporate authorised representatives under a separate arms’ length Australian Financial Services Licence (“AFSL”) to one day wish to operate their own AFSL. You may fall within that group.

If you are considering to apply for your own AFS Licence, you may need to consider the requirements of section 916D of the Act.

Section 916D provides:

  1. A financial services licensee cannot be the authorised representative of another financial services licensee.
  2. A purported authorisation given in breach of this requirement is void.
  3. An authorisation that starts to breach this requirement, because the person authorised is subsequently granted an AFS Licence, is void.

Accordingly, the Act prohibits an AFS Licence holder from being an authorised representative of another AFS Licence holder. Should an authorised representative be subsequently granted an AFS Licence, the authorisation will be void unless an exemption applies.

Notwithstanding section 916D, the Act allows general insurance underwriting agents, or, general insurance brokers to be authorised representatives of another AFS Licence given that they are acting under a binder agreement. This is stated in section 916E (2), that for all purposes connected with contracts that are risk insurance products, or with claims against the insurer, in respect of which the authorised licensee acts under the binder:

  • The authorised licensee is taken to act on behalf of the insurer and not the insured; and
  • If the insured in fact relied in good faith on the conduct of the authorised licensee, the authorised licensee is taken to act on behalf of the insurer regardless of the fact that the authorised licensee did not act within the scope of the binder.

For purposes of clarity, a binder is defined as follows:

Binder means an authorisation given to a person by a financial services licensee who is an insurer to do either or both of the following:

a)  enter into contracts that are risk insurance products on behalf of the insurer as insurer; or

b)  deal with and settle, on behalf of the insurer, claims relating to risk insurance products against the insurer as insurer;

but does not include an authorisation of a kind referred to in paragraph (a) that is limited to effecting contracts of insurance by way of interim cover unless there is also in existence an authority given by the insurer to the person to enter into, on behalf of the insurer and otherwise than by way of interim cover, contract of insurance.


Reliance Auditing Services is a specialist independent auditing services firm providing quality audits to SMSFs, companies, not-for-profits and AFS licensees all over Australia. Reliance Auditing places a huge emphasis on educating our clients to ensure they fulfil their reporting obligations.

Call: 1300 291 060
or email us at

DISCLAIMER: This information is an interpretation of rules, regulations and standards. It should not be considered as general or specific advice and neither purports, nor is intended to be advice on any particular matter. No responsibility can be accepted for those who act on the contents of this publication without first obtaining specific advice. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.